DPM Tharman gives an update on ‘The Russian Laundromat’, another international corruption case
No evidence of major lapses in Anti Money Laundering (AML) controls has surfaced in investigations so far.
You should be aware by now of all the juicy details about the Keppel corruption and bribery scandal.
While Keppel Offshore & Marine Ltd. have agreed to pay more than US$422 million in fines to resolve charges following a US bribery probe, investigations into individuals are still ongoing.
Singapore banks and ‘The Russian Laundromat’
But amidst the Keppel drama, there was another case discussed in Parliament that involved corruption and international intrigue.
This was the alleged involvement of yet-to-be-named Singapore banks in a Russian money laundering scheme. WP MP Sylvia Lim submitted a Parliamentary Question on this issue to the Prime Minister.
She asked whether there is any ongoing investigation by Singapore authorities into the alleged roles of several Singapore banks in a money-laundering scheme dubbed by the Organised Crime and Corruption Reporting Project (OCCRP) in 2014 as “The Russian Laundromat”.
The Russian Laundromat scandal was broken in 2014 by the OCCRP. It’s an investigative reporting platform formed by 40 non-profit investigative centres around the world.
The OCCRP and the Moscow-based newspaper Novaya Gazeta obtained documents from anonymous sources, which revealed that a minimum of US$20 billion (and possibly as much as US$80 billion) was illegally moved out of Russia and laundered by banks around the world.
UK newspaper The Guardian, one of the publications that the OCCRP shared their documents with, reported that an estimated 500 people were allegedly involved in the scheme, including corrupt Russian oligarchs, bankers, and members of the FSB, the Russian spy agency which succeeded the KGB.
The OCCRP has a neat infographic on how the scheme worked, which you can check out at this link.
The Singapore connection
So what does this have to do with Singapore?
Basically, the OCCRP alleges that those involved in the scheme set up shell companies in countries around the world, including Singapore, to receive dodgy cash payments that originated in Russia.
Once these shell companies received the money, they could then safely stow it in their accounts with global banks, where it could be accessed later.
The OCCRP claims that almost US$77 million was laundered in this manner in Singapore.
So is there any meat to these allegations? According to the reply given in Parliament, yes, there is.
Deputy Prime Minister Tharman Shanmugaratnam, in his capacity as Minister-in-charge of the MAS, answered the question in a written reply on Jan. 8. He said:
“MAS’ probe into the specific OCCRP allegations has not been completed. It has thus far not surfaced evidence of major lapses in Anti Money Laundering (AML) controls at banks in Singapore. Where the banks detected suspicious activities relating to the flows in question, they had taken appropriate risk-mitigating measures.”
Tharman made the point that to put things in perspective, during the time while the US$77 million was allegedly laundered through Singapore, our banking system saw US$357 billion of financial flows in total over the same period.
International cooperation needed
However, he emphasised that MAS still takes a serious view of any alleged money laundering through Singapore, regardless of the amount. Said Tharman:
“To reiterate, we are constantly vigilant against the threat of money laundering. That is why we have put in place a robust Anti-Money Laundering/Countering the Financing of Terrorism (AML/CFT) regime. Financial institutions are required to conduct, amongst other things, adequate customer due diligence. This includes rejecting suspicious customers, closely monitoring fund flows, and reporting any suspicious transactions.
As money laundering schemes are increasingly complex and cross-border in nature, international cooperation is critical in identifying, disrupting, and deterring illicit activities. MAS and Singapore’s law enforcement agencies have been exchanging information and working with their foreign counterparts to investigate suspicious schemes.”
So just like the Keppel case, our authorities are also cooperating with foreign officials to investigate the alleged crimes.
But given that this case was broken in 2014, it gives you some idea of how long complex investigations involving cross-border crimes may take.
Here are unrelated articles you should check out next:
Top image by Stanislav KrasilnikovTASS via Getty Images.