On May 7, 2014, the third-year anniversary of the General Election 2011 where the ruling People's Action Party lost a GRC for the first time, this happened.
What actually happened:
Source: Khairil Twitter
Unvarnished reality: The exterior of Block 85 flat at Toa Payoh has been vandalised. Clearly, the vandal is not a ruling party supporter.
How it was reported in the media
STOMP: Excessive amount of censorship applied to protect PAP brand name
Click on image to go to source
Treat PAP as a bad word as well. Censor the message at all cost.
Channel News Asia: Use the cropping technique
Click on image to go to source
Give an excuse that "Picture was cropped due to vulgarities".
Today: Appropriate amount of censorship applied to convey restorative work is in process
Source: Today Facebook
Click on image to go to source
Don't show the original message but convey to the public all is well. Subtly and literally whitewash everything without looking like the message is meant to be concealed.
How it should have been reported
Best amount of censorship to protect PAP brand name:
Selective censorship to show The PAP [LOVE SYMBOL] SG.
Okay, all is well then.
Related articles you may like:
Straits Times readership plunges a bit more this year, establishing medium term decline
Mainstream media having a field day naming wrong people
Here are 3 of the shortest rebuttals against SPH’s defence of STOMP
If you like what you read, follow us on Facebook, Instagram, Twitter and Telegram to get the latest updates.