July 20, 2017, 03:34 PM 
Two days ago, Li Shengwu posted a Facebook update, which was set to "Friends Only" status on Facebook, linking to an article that summarised the Oxley Road saga.
In it, he made a comment that caused enough of a stir that the Attorney-General's Chambers felt the need to look into it.
This prompted Li to call the AG out on what he considered an overreaction, before linking to a Straits Times article.
In it, he pointed out that The Straits Times claim of him taking down his original Facebook post was mistaken.
He followed up that post with this comment a while later.
This prompted one of his friend to caution him about how his posts might potentially be being watched.
This was Li's response.
In case you can't read it, here is what the comment says.
"Scott, of course my uncle's dogs are watching my posts. How else would they know when to bark?
I'm not going to purge my Facebook friends list. Unlike the Singapore government, I'm happy to have friends who disagree with me."
Damn.
Response
While most took the comment in their stride, some felt the comment was in poor taste.
One of them was Facebook page, Fabrications About the PAP (FAP).
The page, which has over 150,000 likes, is dedicated to debunking, well, fabrications about the PAP.
Here is FAP's post on the comment.
In case you can't read it, here it is.
" "Ye Ye - We will try to make you proud."
This is how Shengwu does it, by calling Singaporeans dogs because they disagree with him.
This is what a Oxford & Stanford education is?
LHY and gang have failed to understand that if not for their father or grandfather, their words on the government are worthless.
Their words carry 'weight' because of LKY, not by their own merits. They are in fact abusing their status as family of LKY for their personal dispute.
Unlike LHL, his words carries weight not because of his dad, but because of people like me who voted him in.
面子是别人给的，脸是自己丢的。"
Cool.
This particular part of the post seems quite suspect though.
"This is how Shengwu does it, by calling Singaporeans dogs because they disagree with him."
Which is, at best, an incredibly liberal interpretation of what Li had wrote in his comment.
A point even those who commented on the FAP post pointed out.
Welp.
Here are totally unrelated but equally interesting articles:
4 real life versions of comic book superpowers you used to read about in your childhood