Long story short:
A pleasant-looking fellow with legitimate queries, Teo Yu Sheng, took to the public domain to air his grievances over what he perceives to be an utter lack of transparency on the part of the National University of Singapore Students’ Union, whose president cannot seem to provide a breakdown of how millions of dollars in income and expenditure was allocated in 2013:
Click on picture to go to story
In response, the National University of Singapore Students' Union wrote a lengthy convoluted rebuttal in response to the allegations:
Click on picture to go to story
NUSSU also put up a Facebook post to address the issue:
However, it appears NUSSU's explanation did not go down well.
The biggest bugbear, though, is the way NUSSU defined "transparency", where
...they claim that it “primarily entails a state of mind,” and that it’s “really a matter of that person’s subjective intentions.” In other words, the “intention to be transparent is the determinative factor” of whether a person is truly transparent. They then went on to say that “the NUSSU Exco is transparent to the best that [they] can be.”
You can read the full counterargument of Teo's rebuttal of NUSSU's rebuttal here:
Click on picture to go to story
This rebuttal was published by Teo on Medium, shortly after NUSSU's rebuttal came out.
Mothership.sg is still waiting for NUSSU's reply to our queries.
Related articles:
Top photo via
If you like what you read, follow us on Facebook and Twitter to get the latest updates.
If you like what you read, follow us on Facebook, Instagram, Twitter and Telegram to get the latest updates.